The Better Agents We Need: Reclaiming Human Agency in the Age of AI
- Edesio Santana
- Jun 1
- 2 min read
Why reclaiming human agency matters more than ever in the age of intelligent system

The Turning Point for AI-Human Collaboration
While I am coming back home after a conference in San Francisco, I find myself returning to the larger themes we’ve been exploring across these articles: leadership through stamina and curiosity, the transformation of identity through technology, adaptability as a success metric, empathy as a core capability, and the shift from efficiency to meaning in enterprise services.
This time, we must talk about agency; what it means, the human ability to take action, choose, and shape systems rather than being shaped by them. The metaphor of the “agent” has long captivated popular culture, but in real life, we now need better agents, people, and systems that act not only efficiently, but ethically and intentionally. With artificial intelligence stepping into roles once considered distinctly human, the question is not whether we can automate tasks; it is whether we can still claim responsibility, especially as our tools gain the power to make decisions.
And so my reflection between airports led me to watch a randomly chosen movie, which turned out to be a bad idea. Instead of winding down, it has kept my mind racing and re-examining how we define action, power, and accountability in today’s business environment. It turns out, even leisure can become a kind of mirror, reflecting back the challenges we haven’t fully articulated.
The real challenge ahead is not fictional, nothing about dodging lasers or decoding messages. Perhaps that is about rethinking agency in an era when systems write their own instructions, and leaders are asked not only to drive transformation, but to safeguard what makes it human.
The Development of AI Agents in Shared Services
From Machines of War to Engines of Meaning
It’s easy to romanticize the agent archetype. From the Cold War era to Hollywood blockbusters, book writers and movie directors have created the kind of campy spy who is acting with confidence, following ambiguous orders with unwavering resolve, and often operating outside the constraints of conventional rules, bringing the results with collateral damage.



Comments